Hoodwinked: Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour on Facebook

Published: 28th October 2020
Authors: Chloe Colliver, Eisha Maharasingam-Shah, Jennie King

This briefing provides an overview of ‘coordinated inauthentic behaviour’ (CIB) on Facebook. It reviews the information made public on CIB through Facebook’s own reporting between July 2018 and July 2020, assessing the scale of CIB across Facebook and Instagram, the profit Facebook has made from it and the intricacies of the networks themselves.

The frequency of CIB means the topic struggles to earn column inches or penetrate public debate; larger cases may be covered, but are quickly eclipsed by other, more sensational crises online. The aim of this briefing is twofold: to highlight the residual threat of large-scale platform manipulation on Facebook in the final months before the US presidential elections, and to demonstrate the need for greater data access so that researchers can support detection and learn retrospectively from these incidents of platform manipulation.

About the authors:
Chloe Colliver leads the Digital Analysis Unit at ISD and has been the author of a number of research projects dealing with disinformation on social media.

Eisha Maharasingam-Shah is an Associate working in ISD’s digital research and policy team. She is primarily involved in ISD’s election analysis work, working on projects related to disinformation and extremist campaigns targeting elections.

Jennie King is a Senior Policy Manager, supporting programme design, policy outreach and strategy across the organisation.

Desinformationskampagnen gegen die Wahl: Befunde aus Sachsen-Anhalt

In deutschsprachigen sozialen Medien nehmen Kampagnen, die es zum Ziel haben, Zweifel an der Rechtmäßigkeit von Wahlen zu säen, an Fahrt auf. Dieser Kurzbericht des ISD Germany befasst sich mit Desinformationsversuchen im Kontext der Landtagswahl in Sachsen-Anhalt.

A Snapshot of Far-Right Activity on Gab in Australia

This report provides an analysis of far-right mobilisation on Gab in Australia, based on the analysis of over 45,000 posts produced between 1 January and 30 September 2020. Through this analysis, the study helps evidence the role Gab plays as a hub for explicitly antisemitic far-right extremism and radicalism in the Australian context.