Interim Briefing: Propaganda and Digital Campaigning in the EU Elections

2019 EU Elections Information Operations Analysis: Interim Briefing Paper

The Institute for Strategic Dialogue

The Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) has uncovered a range of digital influence campaigns targeting the European Parliamentary elections through a mix of social media mapping, undercover online reporting and media monitoring.

This interim briefing paper addresses who is behind these malign influence operations and analyses the techniques they use. It also assesses the record of the tech companies in addressing these threats to electoral integrity.

A full post-election analysis will be published in the coming weeks and experts at ISD can be made available for comment on the election results.

Findings include:
• The tactical adoption of the ‘Putin playbook’ by non-state actors, from far right online militias to populist parties in their use of automated influence operations;
• A shift away from ‘information warfare’ to ‘narrative competition’ with the promotion of ‘culture wars’ around issues like migration, Muslims in Europe, family vs. progressive values and increasingly climate policy
• Anti-Semitism, misogyny, and racism as weapons in these elections, amplified by automated accounts;
• Failings of the major tech companies in detecting and responding to such campaigns and in implementing their commitments to improved transparency around political advertising
• Common patterns across the countries in our study that go beyond the copying of the latest digital tactics and constitute a “playbook” for a full-scale campaign against constitutional democracy.

You are welcome to use our data but please cite ‘The Institute for Strategic Dialogue’.

DOWNLOAD THE INTERIM BRIEFING PAPER HERE

Hosting the ‘Holohoax’: A Snapshot of Holocaust Denial Across Social Media

This briefing paper examines the extent to which Holocaust denial content is readily accessible across Facebook, Twitter, Reddit and YouTube. This paper also demonstrates how appropriately applied content moderation policies can be effective in denying dangerous conspiracy theorists a public platform by examining how Holocaust denial content has decreased significantly in the past year on YouTube.

Developing a Civil Society Response to Online Manipulation

This document presents a vision for a pan-civil societal response to online manipulation. In part, it argues, this will come down to capability: building a pooled detection capacity to function as a transparent, public interest alter­native to those built by the tech giants. In part, it will require new organisational philosophies and forms of co-operation, and in part new approaches to funding and support.

The 101 of Disinformation Detection

Disinformation can threaten the activities, objectives and individuals associated with civil society groups and their work. This toolkit lays out an approach that organisations can undertake to begin to track online disinformation on subjects that they care about. The process is intended to have a very low barrier to entry, with each stage achievable using either over-the-counter or free-to-use social media analysis tools.